Internet Explorer Alert

It appears you are using Internet Explorer as your web browser. Please note, Internet Explorer is no longer up-to-date and can cause problems in how this website functions
This site functions best using the latest versions of any of the following browsers: Edge, Firefox, Chrome, Opera, or Safari.
You can find the latest versions of these browsers at https://browsehappy.com

Advertisement Disclaimer

Filters

0
Reset
Language

English

(881)

Spanish

(3)

AAP Categories

News Releases

(168)

Bright Futures

(11)

News Releases from the AAP

(10)

News Releases from Pediatrics

(3)

Committees Councils Sections

(1)

Filters

0
Reset
Language

English

(881)

Spanish

(3)

AAP Categories

News Releases

(168)

Bright Futures

(11)

News Releases from the AAP

(10)

News Releases from Pediatrics

(3)

Committees Councils Sections

(1)

Let Me Stay With Mom! - Safely Doing Less For 35-Week Infants
Hospital Pediatrics
May 1, 2025
This case was modified slightly to prevent patient identification.A 35 3/7-week 2.7 kg infant was born by vaginal delivery after premature rupture of membranes and preterm labor. Pregnancy was complicated only by short cervix with one course of betamethasone at 28 weeks. Group B streptococcus status was unknown; there were no other sepsis risk factors, and the overall early onset sepsis score was 0.2 of 1000 live births. The infant emerged with low tone and weak cry that improved rapidly with routine measures. After 10 minutes of skin-to-skin (STS), the infant was transferred to the special care nursery (SCN) for 24 hours of continuous cardiorespiratory monitoring, as per current hospital guideline for infants born at 35 0/7 to 35 6/7 weeks' gestation.The infant remained clinically well. He was bottle fed 15 to 20 mL of pasteurized donor human milk every 3 hours and breastfed once at 4 hours of life (HOL) with a LATCH score of 7 out of 10. Nurses documented coordinated feeding effort, and blood glucose levels were normal. At 21 HOL his temperature was 35.3°, which increased to 36.9° with radiant warming. He was then placed in an incubator without a trial of STS or open crib. He had no apneic, bradycardic, or desaturation (ABD) events during the first 24 HOL. However, because of neonatologist concern for insufficient oral intake and need for incubator, he remained in the SCN.On day of life (DOL) 1, the occupational therapist (OT) noted appropriate oral feeding. On DOL 2, the infant had an episode of coughing during bottle feeding with peripheral oxygen saturation of 85% to 91%. The neonatologist decided to continue observation in the SCN to determine if the event was related to prematurity or another etiology. A chest X-ray was normal. Nurses continued to document 20 to 40 mL feeds with intermittent coughing during bottle feeding, but none while breastfeeding. On DOL 3, the OT and the speech language pathologist (SLP) agreed that the oral feeding skills were appropriate and the coughing was not consistent with aspiration. The infant continued to have brief, self-resolved desaturation events (<20 seconds without apnea) and intermittent coughing with bottle feeding requiring pacing. He breastfed twice daily without concerns. His last desaturation event was documented on DOL 10.The infant had weight loss of −2% on DOL 1, −7.4% on DOL 2 (90th percentile on the Newborn Weight Tool [Newt] curve),1 and −7.6% on DOL 3 (50th percentile per Newt). He continued to have normal urine and stool output, but had weight loss of −10% on DOL 5, which prompted an increase in his intake goal to 160 ml/kg/d (52 mL every 3 hours). He was not able to meet that goal and a nasogastric tube was placed. He subsequently had daily weight gain. He achieved full oral feeds on DOL 11 and regained birthweight on DOL 12. He was discharged home on DOL 13.Late preterm infants (LPI) are those born between 34 0/7 to 36 6/7 weeks' gestation and account for most preterm births in the United States.2 Although these infants are at risk for respiratory distress, hypothermia, hypoglycemia, poor feeding, and hyperbilirubinemia,3 there is variation in which hospital unit they are cared for. The American Academy of Pediatrics Policy Statement on Levels of Neonatal Care states that well newborn units can care for infants 35 to 37 weeks' gestation who are physiologically stable.4 A survey of hospitals in the Better Outcomes through Research for Newborns Network found that 80% routinely admit 35-week infants to the well newborn unit,5 and Joshi et al found at their institution that 63% of 35-week infants remained in well newborn care for the entire birth hospitalization.6 In contrast, at our institution, of the 94 35-week infants delivered in 2023, only 35% were discharged from the well newborn unit, which raises a potential concern for overutilization of SCN care. The rooming-in model for 35-week infants requires increased nursing, lactation, and medical support to achieve optimal outcomes and ensure identification of infants needing additional support,7-9 but LPI who are rooming in with their parent(s) may have more breastfeeding success10,11 and a shorter length of hospital stay as compared with those who are cared for in the NICU or SCN.7,11 Additionally, NICU admissions can impact parental mental health and influence parental perception of their child's vulnerability.12-14 In the following sections, we outline the aspects of this infant's care that may demonstrate opportunities for safely reducing unnecessary interventions.The National Perinatal Association guideline for care of LPI recommends 'immediate, uninterrupted, and extended skin-to-skin contact for stable infants until after the first breastfeeding (usually 1-2 hours).'15 The benefits of STS include decreased hypoglycemia, better thermoregulation, improved cardiopulmonary stabilization and increased breastfeeding success.16-18 There may also be benefits of STS for parent attachment and mental health.19 Despite his clinical stability after delivery, this infant received only 10 minutes of STS. Increased STS opportunities after delivery and during rooming-in care may have resulted in improved thermoregulation, more breastfeeding, and possibly avoided incubator use. Joshi et al found that although 68% of 35-week infants had hypothermia, only 36.5% required an incubator, which suggests that less intensive measures work for many of these infants.6LPI are known to be at risk for feeding difficulties that may delay hospital discharge and result in lower rates of breastfeeding than their full-term counterparts.20 The European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition (ESPGHAN) notes a lack of nutritional guidelines for LPI, strongly recommends breastmilk as the optimal feeding method, and emphasizes the need for extended lactation support.20 The standard volume goal of 160 ml/kg/d used in our institution is derived from the ESPGHAN guidelines for enteral nutrition for the preterm infant that are intended for infants weighing 1000 to 1800 g and may not be appropriate for LPI.20 Studies have shown that tube feeding and nutritional support among LPI are most common in 34-week infants and for those weighing less than 2 kg.6,21 Over the first 24 HOL, this infant maintained normal blood glucose levels and took 15 to 20 mL per feed by bottle, which is over the recommend 2 to 10 mL supplement recommended by the National Perinatal Association Guideline and the Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine (ABM).15,22 However, his SCN stay was extended in part because of concern of poor feeding. Kumar et al found first feeding volumes of more than 8 ml/kg increased emesis 2.5-fold in LPI, and concluded that nonphysiologic feeding significantly contributes to feeding intolerance.23 This infant's SCN stay was further prolonged by weight loss and feeding tube placement. Recommendations on maximum weight loss for late preterm infants range from −7% recommended by the ABM to −10% by the National Perinatal Association.15,22 This infant's nadir weight loss of −10% on DOL 5 prompted an increase in his feeding goal and subsequent nasogastric tube placement. Although increased nutritional support is likely needed for this infant, less invasive measures, including caloric fortification of breastmilk and/or more frequent feedings, may have been equally successful.This infant's SCN stay was also extended because of coughing and brief, self-resolved desaturation events with bottle feeds; neither were documented during breastfeeding. Monitoring for ABD events is a frequent justification for empirical admission of all 35-week infants to a higher level of care. Although recent studies around car seat testing have demonstrated opportunities to safely reduce monitoring for subclinical ABDs in this population,24 the clinical significance of feeding-related events in late preterm infants is unclear and has been demonstrated to prolong hospital stay.25,26 Studies have shown increased oxygenation while breastfeeding when compared with bottle feeding.27,28 Ultrasound imaging shows that a vacuum between the tongue and palate is the primary mechanism of milk removal during breastfeeding, and ratios of sucking, swallowing, and breathing likely change in response to flow rates during milk ejection.29 A higher rate of swallowing may be seen with bottle feeding, which results in more disruption of breathing and thus desaturations associated with bottle feeds.27,28 Concern for cough with feeds resulted in OT and SLP evaluation for this infant, as well as a chest X-ray, all of which did not suggest aspiration. The laryngeal cough reflex develops around 1 to 2 months.30 Before the cough reflex, the laryngeal chemoreflex is the primary method of airway protection that is manif...
Journals & PublicationsBreast FeedingSkinDesaturation Of BloodWeight Reduction
The Urgent Need For More Federal Funding For Pediatric Firearm Injury Prevention Research
Pediatrics
April 1, 2025
Firearm injuries and deaths among children and youth in the United States have continued to increase over the last decade, despite increasing attention to this public health issue. Firearms are now the leading cause of death for US children and youth, overtaking motor vehicle crashes (MVCs) in 2017.1 In 2022, the most recent year of data available from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), there were 10 957 deaths resulting in 498 839 years of potential life lost from firearms in children and youth aged 0 to 24 years old.2 The reasons for this are multifactorial and more complex than for other leading causes of pediatric fatalities, including MVCs, drowning, cancer, and overdoses.2 However, despite the substantial role firearms have in causing pediatric mortality and morbidity, and a need to understand the complexity of the problem, there has been, and continues to be, remarkably little federal funding for firearm injury prevention research.In the early 1990s, the CDC funded rigorous research related to firearms. A seminal study published in 1993 concluded that having a firearm in the home increased the risk of death from a firearm, primarily from suicide and intimate partner violence.3 One reaction to this study resulted in the US Congress attempting to eliminate funding for the CDC's National Center for Injury Prevention and Control in 1996, which was unsuccessful. Nevertheless, the US Congress did successfully remove $2.6 million in appropriations to the CDC-the amount of funding designated for firearm injury research.4 This occurred with the passage of the Dickey Amendment, which stated no federal funds to the CDC could be used for research to 'advocate or promote gun control.'4Interpretation of the Dickey Amendment was extended to the National Institutes of Health (NIH) in 2011, eliminating almost all federal funding for firearm injury prevention research. Only with the continued rise of firearm violence, including increasing frequencies of mass shooting events like the Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School shooting in Parkland, Florida in 2018, was the Dickey Amendment reinterpreted.4 In 2020, the US Congress passed appropriations for firearm injury prevention research for a total amount of $25 million-for all ages, not just pediatrics-with $12.5 million for the CDC and $12.5 million for the NIH (Figure 1). Since then, congressional funding for the CDC and NIH has remained flat at $25 million in 2021, 2022, 2023, and 2024. Although overall federal research funding has demonstrated increases, peaking at $62.2 million in 2021, the most recent data from 2022 shows a decrease of more than $10 million in annual funding. Further, this year's funding was threatened again with the proposed elimination of the CDC's National Center for Injury Prevention and Control when the House Appropriations Committee approved the FY25 Labor, Health and Human Services, Education, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act.5 Although this version of the budget was not ultimately adopted by the US Congress, funding for firearm injury prevention research continues to be in jeopardy.Research funding for firearm injury prevention should be a science policy priority, given the long-term effects of pediatric firearm violence in measurable years of potential life lost and in the less measurable yet devastating effects on survivors and their communities. With essentially no dedicated federal research funding for pediatric firearm injury prevention for decades, few investments were available to build research infrastructure and career pathways for pediatric firearm injury prevention researchers. This is in stark contrast to other injury mechanisms and medical conditions, such as MVCs and pediatric cancer. Given the past dearth of support for any type of firearm injury prevention research, increasing investments are urgently needed now to fund research and build research infrastructure.Funding is essential to advance innovative research so we can better understand risk and protective factors to reverse this ongoing trend of increasing firearm injuries and deaths to our children and youth. We need to develop, study, and implement effective community, hospital, and school-based interventions for community firearm violence,6 and more comprehensive, accurate, and real-time data sources on not just fatal, but also nonfatal firearm injuries, must also be created, as we have for MVCs from the National Highway Safety Transportation Administration.1 Increased research funding is also critical to develop and grow a diverse and multidisciplinary research workforce because the decades-long funding gap resulted in a loss of nearly 3 generations of firearm injury prevention researchers. It will take years to fill this deficit of researchers not just in medicine but also in the fields of criminology, sociology, public health, law, and others. Additional researchers, research infrastructure, and research are essential to decrease firearm injuries and deaths by increasing our knowledge of risk and protective factors and effective injury prevention and harm reduction strategies and legislative policies. Because firearm violence affects individuals of all ages, these investments would also benefit public health more broadly.One important example of how federal research funding has improved health outcomes for children is in the treatment of pediatric cancer. Large investments in funding and research have led to tremendous advances in developing innovative agents and curative treatments through research and the development of the necessary research workforce and infrastructure.7 As a result, we have witnessed dramatic improvements not only in survival, with fatality rates decreasing more than 30% in the last 25 years (Figure 1), but also in quality of life for children during and after cancer treatment.7Motor vehicle safety is another area where we have seen resounding success in decreasing deaths and injuries to children.1 In addition to federal funding for research, federal databases provide detailed information on fatal and nonfatal crashes. Robust research funding has focused on decreasing death and disability due to MVCs. These resources have provided important information on risk and protective factors related to motor vehicle safety. As a result, effective interventions f...
Journals & Publications

First

Previous

1
2
3
4
5
6
...
94
1
2
3
4
...
94

Next

Last

Feedback Form